In today’s world, the allure of celebrity culture is undeniably strong. The glamorous lives of stars are constantly on display, influencing millions. However, this fascination often overshadows a critical issue: the significant environmental impact caused by their lifestyles and careers. From extravagant concert tours to frequent private jet use, the entertainment industry contributes massively to carbon emissions. While some celebrities are beginning to take steps toward sustainability, a larger movement is necessary to hold these influential figures accountable for their environmental impact.

—

Many celebrities live in a bubble of privilege, often indifferent to the environmental damage they cause. Their luxurious lifestyles, marked by frequent travel and extravagant consumption, contribute significantly to carbon emissions and other environmental issues. Concert tours, for example, are a staple of the entertainment industry, drawing in millions of fans worldwide. However, the environmental cost is staggering. 

A prime example is Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, which has been a global sensation. In just one month, the American singer’s tour flights emitted approximately 393 metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2). To put this into perspective, the average person’s annual carbon footprint is around 5 metric tons. The logistics of moving equipment, staff, and artists across countries and continents require substantial air travel, one of the most carbon-intensive forms of transportation. The need for large-scale infrastructure, including lighting, sound systems, and temporary stages, adds to the carbon footprint. While the economic benefits and cultural significance of these tours are evident, the environmental costs cannot be ignored.

Another significant issue with celebrities is their use of private jets, which, while epitomizing luxury and convenience, come at a high environmental cost. Private jets emit substantially more CO2 per passenger than commercial flights. A private jet produces approximately 2 metric tons of CO2 per hour of flight, compared to about 0.2 metric tons of CO2 per passenger for the same duration on a commercial flight. 

While some may argue that private jets are used for the safety of celebrities, it is evident that these flights are often unnecessary. Many celebrities have used their private jets for extremely short trips that could easily have been done by car, with no valid justification. For example, Kylie Jenner took a private jet for a flight that lasted just 17 minutes. Similarly, rapper Drake took a 14-minute flight three times in a month. In 2022, Swift topped the list “the worst private jet CO2 offenders” created by sustainability marketing firm Yard, after her jet was found to have flown 170 times that year, leading to 8,293.54 tonnes of emissions – 1,184.8 times more than the average person.

Climate activists have repeatedly denounced celebrities for their excessive and reckless use of private planes. In June, two Just Stop Oil climate activists were arrested after cutting through a fence at a London airport and spray-painting private jets orange.

Lack of Accountability and Hypocrisy

Despite the glaring environmental impact of their actions, many celebrities fail to take responsibility. Some even go to great lengths to avoid accountability. Swift, for instance, faced backlash for her excessive jet usage. Instead of addressing the issue, she threatened legal action against a student who tracked and publicly shared her private jet flights. 

This reaction underscores the disconnect between her public persona and the private actions that contradict her supposed commitment to environmental causes. Such responses highlight the lack of genuine accountability among many celebrities, who often prioritize their image over meaningful environmental responsibility.

Celebrities are also often accused of hypocrisy. Leonardo DiCaprio, a vocal advocate for environmental conservation, also faced criticism for his use of private jets. In 2016, he used a private jet to travel from Cannes to New York to accept an environmental award, only to fly back to France the next day. The blatant contradiction between his advocacy and actions highlights the hypocrisy that often goes unchallenged in celebrity culture.

Fandoms’ Complicity

Fandoms play a significant role in perpetuating the environmental damage caused by celebrities. Their uncritical support and adoration enable celebrities to continue their reckless behavior unchecked.

Not only do they ignore their favorite celebrities’ massive carbon footprints, but they also contribute to the problem by buying into their brands. This support only amplifies the celebrities’ influence and ego, encouraging them to continue ignoring important environmental issues.

An example is the endless purchases of merchandise, much of which is produced in unethical and environmentally damaging conditions, contributing to environmental degradation and labor exploitation. 

Besides this, attending concerts and other large-scale events without questioning their ecological footprint is detrimental to the environment. For example, the annual Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival, attended by numerous celebrities, generates an estimated 107 tons of waste each day. The contradiction is stark: celebrities who preach about climate change on social media are often the same ones participating in events that leave behind massive amounts of trash.

Time For Change

The environmental impact of celebrities is a crisis that demands immediate action. Fandoms have a responsibility to stop enabling the destructive behaviors of their idols. Turning a blind eye is no longer an option. It is time to channel admiration into accountability and transform the way we engage with celebrity culture. Only by demanding real, measurable change can we mitigate the severe environmental impact of these larger-than-life figures and work towards a more sustainable future for all.

We must leverage their immense power and influence to our advantage, compelling them to use their platforms to drive positive change. We can no longer dismiss celebrities as mere entertainers; with our planet in a crisis, they must take responsibility and act as catalysts for environmental and social reform.

The post Celebrity Culture and Environmental Impact: An Urgent Call for Accountability appeared first on Earth.Org.

In Canada, sustainable indigenous practices are gaining recognition as valuable contributions to environmental stewardship and conservation. Drawing on traditional knowledge and a deep connection to the land, indigenous communities are leading the way in implementing sustainable practices that promote biodiversity, protect ecosystems, and foster resilience in the face of climate change.

—

Indigenous communities worldwide have maintained a deep connection with their natural surroundings for centuries, despite their struggles. From the Palestinians in the Middle East to the Sámi’s of the Arctic, profound insights and sustainable practices have played a crucial role in fostering environmental harmony and offer invaluable lessons for contemporary conservation. Gaining insight into the enduring practices of these communities will not only serve as a motivational catalyst for everyone to strive for improvement but also underscore the fact that these communities should spearhead any movement for contemporary conservation. 

This holds particularly true for Canada, where Indigenous communities have faced the eradication of their sustainable practices alongside the loss of their land and are now disproportionately experiencing the effects of climate change.

Medicinal Practices

Recognizing the vital role that Indigenous communities play as stewards of the land is essential to forge a path towards a more harmonious and sustainable coexistence with nature. Integrating traditional knowledge with modern conservation practices, fostering collaboration, and respecting the rights of indigenous communities are crucial steps in preserving the environmental wisdom embedded in their traditions.

A good example is the pharmaceutical industry. Canada ranks third globally for per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with the pharmaceutical industry playing a major role. The environmental repercussions of toxic chemicals contained in medicines, the carbon footprint of manufacturing and distribution, and the waste of unused products are all profound, making the entire cycle of medicine exhibit severe environmental concerns. While Canada has tried to include their health care system in their decarbonization agenda, it failed to take the medicinal practices of Indigenous communities into account.

You might also like: How Medical Packaging Is Changing Amid Environmental Concern

Indigenous communities in Canada have cultivated a profound tradition and expertise in medicinal practices, firmly grounded in their intimate connection with the land and natural resources. They have identified over 400 different species of plants, each possessing medicinal benefits, showcasing their deep knowledge of the local flora and its healing properties. 

Traditional healers, which are like health practitioners, possess an intricate understanding of the medicinal qualities of various plants, including cedar, sweetgrass, and sage. By relying on local flora, these practices reduce the ecological impact associated with the transportation and cultivation of non-indigenous medicinal plants, aligning with environmentally sustainable principles and contributing to a smaller carbon footprint.

Moreover, the medicinal approach of the Indigenous peoples of Canada also ensures that the use of natural resources is balanced and does not contribute to habitat degradation or loss, adhering to strict cultural protocols concerning the harvesting, preparation, and administration of medicinal remedies. Additionally, every component of the plant is utilized, like the roots, bark, leaves, and sap, ensuring minimal waste.

In recent history, Canada has harvested plants for pharmaceutical industries, like pacific yew, but excessive exploitation has resulted in the depletion of these trees and plants. That said, Western pharmaceutical companies can learn from Indigenous people by embracing the sustainable use of natural resources and contribute to more culturally sensitive and environmentally conscious healthcare practices. 

You might also like: How Deforestation Impacts Indigenous Communities

The Fishing Industry

Seafood is a big part of the Canadian diet, with over 85% of Canadians regularly consuming fish. Having such an extensive coastline, as well as numerous lakes and rivers, Canada’s seafood industry goes beyond its borders: in 2022 alone, the country exported around US$83 million-worth of fish.

Being such a big industry, one of Canada’s ways to keep up with such a high demand are fish farms, which use open net pens to bread, most commonly, salmon. This technique is very high risk, as it spreads diseases, parasites, and toxic chemicals, to the marine ecosystem. Disrupting the marine ecosystem harms the environment by destabilizing biodiversity, jeopardizing food chains, and compromising water quality. 

Moreover, the industry’s mismanagement has severe adverse repercussions on the marine ecosystem, including overfishing, unintended species catch, excessive legal catch limits, illegal harvesting of young species hindering reproduction, and various other adverse impacts on the marine ecosystem. 

Harboring almost 80% of the world’s life, the ocean stores over 50 times the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, meaning that the degradation of these vital marine ecosystems only exacerbates climate change and ocean acidification.

Indigenous communities in Canada also engage in fishing, with techniques that prioritize ecological balance and respect for marine ecosystems, considering species, size, and timing to ensure the preservation of fish populations. 

A great example of an Indigenous community contributing to maintaining the biodiversity of aquatic environments is the Tsleil-Waututh, a First Nations band government in British Columbia that relies on sex selection during the harvesting of spawning salmon, releasing the females to ensure the longevity of fish stocks.

Guardians of Nature and Humanity

While climate change threatens every living being in Canada, Indigenous communities like First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples are the ones most impacted by climate change, with the majority of them residing in areas of the country – such as the North – that are already experiencing swift changes in climate. On top of that, these communities, whose identity and existence rely on the land, waters, animals, plants, and other natural resources, are also grappling with profound inequities stemming from historical and ongoing effects of colonization.

Indigenous people, guardians of nature and humanity, have been robbed of their nation, their territory, and the resources that constitute the very core of their identity. Their voices ought to take precedence in governance, and until that transformation occurs, the forefront of any climate change initiatives in Canada should be steered by the most knowledgeable stewards of this land.

Featured image: Province of British Columbia/Flickr

You might also like: Op-Ed: Listening to Those Most Impacted by Climate Change

The post Indigenous Wisdom: Leading the Path to Sustainable Practices in Canada appeared first on Earth.Org.